Blog

min read

Redefining Security Roles for the AI Era: Responsibilities and Controls

By

Dor Sarig

and

June 18, 2025

min read

All security roles you know are evolving beyond recognition. The penetration tester now hunts prompt injection and jailbreaking vulnerabilities alongside SQL injection and API flaws. The CISO manages AI-specific risk frameworks. Data security engineers protect against model inversion and data poisoning attacks.

Change extends far beyond simple job description updates. Data itself has become executable, while software now possesses agency. Nine core security roles are morphing into AI-native positions that demand fluency in both traditional cybersecurity and entirely new threat vectors. Here's exactly how your role is changing and what you need to do about it.

The Nine-Role Evolution Matrix

Core security roles are undergoing fundamental shifts. These changes represent the emergence of entirely new professional archetypes that blend your existing expertise with capabilities you're probably still discovering.

Penetration Testing & Risk Analysis: Hunting AI Vulnerabilities and Weaknesses

Your established foundation in DAST, SAST, SCA, fuzzing, and penetration testing methodologies now extends to include AI red teaming platforms and model scanning frameworks that assess AI system vulnerabilities through adversarial testing.

The threat landscape has expanded significantly:

  • Prompt injection attacks target conversational AI interfaces through natural language manipulation
  • Model extraction vulnerabilities allow attackers to steal proprietary AI models via carefully crafted queries
  • Jailbreaking attempts bypass AI safety constraints through sophisticated prompt engineering techniques that exploit model reasoning patterns

Your career evolution transforms you into an AI vulnerability specialist who understands both code flaws and data poisoning techniques. You're developing fluency in both binary exploits and natural language attacks that manipulate AI reasoning.

Application Security Engineering: Implementing Runtime AI Guardrails

Your established toolkit of WAF, API Gateway, ADR, and RASP solutions now includes guardrails implementation, data masking protocols, and PII reduction systems. A fundamental shift from static security rules to dynamic, context-aware protection.

The emerging threats create entirely new challenges:

  • Data leakage occurs when AI systems inadvertently expose sensitive information through responses, embeddings, or side channels
  • Data privacy violations emerge when AI applications fail to protect personal information during processing, storage, or model training
  • Application abuse/takeover exploits AI-powered features to gain unauthorized access or control over application functionality

Your role expansion moves conventional application protection into AI-specific input and output filtering. You're developing technical sophistication to understand executable data patterns while maintaining expertise in established application security measures.

GRC Management: Orchestrating AI Governance Across Global Standards

Your established frameworks of ISO 27001, SOC2, GDPR compliance, and S-BOM management now incorporate an AI governance layer that includes ISO 42001 and the new ISO 42005 requirements for AI management systems, NIST AI RMF adoption for comprehensive risk frameworks, EU AI Act compliance with emerging regulatory demands, and AI-BOM tracking systems for AI component inventory.

New compliance areas demand your attention:

  • AI bias and fairness assessments require algorithmic understanding that wasn't part of compliance programs just two years ago
  • Data privacy in AI contexts goes beyond conventional protection methods
  • Model governance protocols must ensure AI systems behave consistently with organizational policies across all deployment scenarios

Your strategic evolution balances innovation velocity with AI-specific regulatory demands. Managing emerging standards that are still being defined globally. AI governance approaches feed directly into executive decision-making, where CISOs are grappling with entirely new categories of strategic risk.

CISO Leadership: Leading AI Security Roadmaps to Meet Business Strategy

Your established command center of CSPM, SIEM, and security dashboards has evolved into AI-native operations. You're working with AI-SPM (AI Security Posture Management), business AI risk assessment platforms, and AI asset inventory management systems. Visibility into AI deployments you probably didn't know existed across your organization.

Strategic challenges now encompass areas that require entirely new leadership approaches:

  • Strategic AI risk evaluation could impact business continuity in ways conventional risk models never anticipated
  • Shadow AI usage detection reveals unauthorized tools proliferating across departments faster than you can track them
  • AI security ROI measurement demands demonstrating clear business value to leadership who may not fully understand the technical complexities involved

Your executive evolution requires leading organizations through AI advancement while maintaining robust security posture across both established and emerging threat vectors. You're overseeing AI governance frameworks alongside conventional security operations. Creating a unified approach that addresses comprehensive organizational risk.

IT Security Infrastructure: Securing AI Deployments Across Your Enterprise

Your established monitoring systems of IDS/IPS networks, PAM solutions, and shadow IT discovery tools now include shadow AI discovery platforms, AI agent controls, and comprehensive AI governance frameworks. Tracking AI deployments across your entire infrastructure landscape.

Infrastructure risks now encompass threats that conventional security monitoring wasn't designed to handle:

  • Sensitive data leakage through AI systems exposes confidential information via unauthorized model outputs or system interactions
  • Data privacy breaches in AI infrastructure compromise personal data through inadequate isolation between AI workloads and datasets
  • Agent compromise allows attackers to hijack autonomous AI systems, turning them into persistent threats within your network

Your operational shift expands infrastructure security to include AI model deployment and agent management while maintaining established IT security standards across all systems. Infrastructure evolution creates new data flows and storage requirements that directly impact how data security engineers must protect organizational assets.

Data Security Engineering: Protecting Training Data from Poisoning and Theft

Your established protection methods of DLP tools, encryption protocols, and access control systems now include data and model integrity verification systems and differential privacy implementation. Protecting individual data points within training datasets.

Advanced threats targeting your domain create entirely new vulnerability categories:

  • Data poisoning attacks corrupt AI training processes at the source level
  • Training data leakage exposes sensitive information through model outputs in ways that established DLP tools cannot detect
  • Model inversion vulnerabilities allow attackers to reconstruct private training data from model responses, bypassing conventional data protection measures

Your technical specialization involves protecting both static data repositories and dynamic AI training datasets. Applying established data protection principles to AI-specific data flows that span multiple cloud environments and processing pipelines.

DevSecOps Engineering: Building Security into AI Pipelines

Your established security integration of pipeline scanners and container security scanning now incorporates AI supply chain tools and ML pipeline security frameworks. Addressing the unique challenges of AI model development and deployment processes.

Pipeline threats create entirely new attack vectors that established DevSecOps practices weren't designed to address:

  • Model tampering detection ensures AI models haven't been modified maliciously during the development process
  • Pipeline poisoning prevention protects the AI development process itself from compromise
  • Model drift monitoring identifies when AI systems begin behaving unexpectedly in production environments

Your process evolution integrates AI security checks into conventional CI/CD pipelines while securing both standard software deployments and AI model deployment pipelines requiring specialized validation procedures.

Security Architects: Designing AI-Resilient Systems

Your established foundation in security frameworks, threat modeling, and zero-trust design principles now extends to include AI reference architectures, LLM threat modeling frameworks, and secure AI deployment patterns that integrate protection at the architectural level.

The architectural challenges demand entirely new design considerations:

  • Modeling LLM-specific attack surfaces requires a new approach to threat modeling. Architects must now account for vulnerabilities like prompt injection, insecure output handling, and supply chain poisoning.
  • Architectural blind spots emerge when traditional security designs fail to account for AI's autonomous decision-making capabilities
  • Unsafe AI system interactions occur when multiple AI components communicate without proper validation or security boundaries

Your architectural evolution transforms you into an AI security architect who designs resilient systems that anticipate both traditional attacks and AI-specific threats. You're creating blueprints that balance innovation enablement with comprehensive security controls across hybrid AI/traditional system architectures.

Cloud Security Engineers: Securing Distributed AI Workloads

Your established expertise in cloud security controls, CSPM platforms, and multi-cloud governance now incorporates AI workload isolation techniques, AI environment Hardening, and cloud-native AI security monitoring. Managing AI deployments across hyperscalers AWS SageMaker, Azure ML, Google Vertex AI as well as data platforms like Databricks with unified security policies.

Cloud-specific AI threats create unique challenges:

  • AI Telemetry & Logging gaps prevent detection of anomalous AI behavior and model performance degradation across distributed systems while failing to meet emerging regulatory compliance requirements for AI audit trails
  • Resource hijacking exploits cloud AI workloads to mine cryptocurrency or launch attacks using your computational resources
  • Model & data theft targets valuable AI intellectual property and training datasets stored in misconfigured cloud environments

Your cloud evolution requires securing ephemeral AI workloads that spin up and down dynamically while maintaining visibility across multi-cloud AI deployments. You're implementing cloud-native security controls that protect both the AI models and the massive data flows they generate across global cloud regions.

How Pillar Security Enables Your Evolution

The convergence of established security practices with AI-specific capabilities creates unprecedented complexity. Security professionals need platforms that bridge conventional cybersecurity expertise with AI-native protection capabilities.

Pillar Security addresses this challenge through unified AI security operations that complement your existing security infrastructure. Our platform provides AI fingerprinting and asset discovery that identifies shadow AI deployments across your organization. Advanced adversarial testing capabilities enable penetration testers to conduct comprehensive AI red teaming exercises. Adaptive guardrails protect against prompt injection and jailbreaking attempts while maintaining application performance.

For GRC managers, Pillar offers comprehensive AI governance frameworks that integrate with existing compliance workflows. CISOs gain centralized visibility into AI risk across all seven security domains through consolidated dashboards that track both conventional and AI-specific threats. Infrastructure teams benefit from automated AI agent monitoring and control systems that prevent unauthorized deployments.

Data security engineers leverage Pillar's differential privacy implementation and training data protection capabilities. DevSecOps teams integrate AI security scanning directly into CI/CD pipelines through our comprehensive ML pipeline security framework.

Ready to Secure Your AI Future?

Whether you're a penetration tester, application security engineer, GRC manager, CISO, IT security professional, data security engineer, or DevSecOps practitioner, your role is evolving into something more powerful and essential than ever before.

Pillar Security provides the unified AI security platform that enables this evolution while strengthening your established security foundations. Request a demo to discover how our comprehensive platform can help you master the new AI security landscape.

Subscribe and get the latest security updates

Back to blog

MAYBE YOU WILL FIND THIS INTERSTING AS WELL