Blog

min read

What is AI Assets Sprawl? Causes, Risks, and Control Strategies

By

Dor Sarig

and

May 28, 2025

min read

What is AI Asset Sprawl?

AI asset sprawl refers to the uncontrolled proliferation of AI models, datasets, training pipelines, and AI-powered applications across an organization's infrastructure. 

When we talk about security for AI, we all agree that it should start with visibility, as the old statement says: you can't protect what you can't see. But what are those assets one should identify when it comes to AI security and governance? In other words, what are the building blocks or atoms of every AI process in our organization?

The AI boom has led to rapid, often unmanaged deployment of AI assets. What started as a few experimental models in the data science department has evolved into a complex ecosystem of interconnected AI components spread across cloud platforms, on-premise servers, edge devices, and third-party services. Without proper management, this sprawl can quickly spiral out of control, creating vulnerabilities that bad actors can exploit and compliance nightmares that keep legal teams awake at night.

AI Assets Sprawl Goes Beyond Model Discovery

AI asset sprawl encompasses far more than just model tracking. While many organizations focus on cataloging their LLMs, comprehensive AI asset management requires identifying and securing the entire ecosystem of components that power AI capabilities across its development lifecycle.

Consider a typical AI-powered customer service chatbot. While the language model at its core is important, the security and governance story doesn't end there. The chatbot relies on system prompts that define its behavior, datasets that provide context through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), API credentials that connect to backend services through tool calls, user interaction logs that contain sensitive customer data, deployment endpoints that serve responses, and increasingly, MCP servers that orchestrate context and tool interactions across multiple AI services. Each of these components represents a potential security risk if left unmanaged.

AI Assets Sprawl: Key Assets for Identification

The table below provides a breakdown of the key AI assets companies need to map and catalog across their AI ecosystem. A detailed analysis of each asset type, including descriptions and examples, can be found at the end of this blog (Appendix A).

Common Causes of AI Assets Sprawl

Understanding why AI sprawl occurs is the first step toward controlling it. Five primary factors drive the proliferation of unmanaged AI assets in modern organizations.

  1. Rapid Growth - AI assets multiply exponentially faster than traditional IT assets. While a typical application might deploy monthly, AI teams iterate daily—creating new models, fine-tuning existing ones, and spawning experimental variants. This velocity of change overwhelms traditional asset management approaches designed for slower-moving infrastructure.
  2. Shadow AI - Teams across the organization spin up AI models without Security and IT knowledge or approval. Data scientists experiment with new model hosting platforms, engineers connect AI code assistants to private repositories, or development teams integrate third-party AI debugging tools—all bypassing security reviews and creating invisible AI footprints that Security teams discover only after proprietary code or training data has been exposed.
  3. Data Multiplication - Every model interaction generates new data assets that require governance. User prompts contain sensitive business information, model responses create intellectual property, conversation logs accumulate personal data, and feedback loops generate training datasets. This continuous data generation creates an ever-expanding universe of assets that need protection and compliance oversight.
  4. Version Explosion - AI assets exist in constant flux—models get fine-tuned, prompts get optimized, and configurations get tweaked. Unlike traditional software with clear version numbers, AI components evolve organically through experimentation. Teams might have dozens of prompt variations, multiple model checkpoints, and countless configuration permutations, making it nearly impossible to track which version is deployed where.
Pillar Security automatically discovers all AI assets across the organization and flags unmonitored components to prevent security blind spots.

The Risks of AI Assets Sprawl

Now that we’ve covered how AI sprawl occurs, let’s focus on the security and compliance implications. Here are the most significant risks associated with AI sprawl:

  • Increased Attack Surface - Every untracked AI asset exponentially expands your attack surface. A single exposed model endpoint can leak training data, enable model extraction, or allow prompt injection attacks. With AI components from notebooks to inference endpoints scattered across your infrastructure, attackers have countless entry points to exploit—from misconfigured storage buckets to hijacked API credentials that can rack up costs or access sensitive capabilities.
  • Inconsistent Security Policies Across AI Systems - Scattered AI assets make uniform security enforcement nearly impossible. While one team implements robust authentication, another leaves endpoints wide open; some encrypt training data, others store it in plaintext. This creates a "weakest link" problem where attackers need only find one poorly secured asset to compromise your entire AI ecosystem, and without centralized visibility, policy violations go undetected until they cause incidents.
  • Weakened Compliance Posture - Regulatory requirements like ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act become impossible to meet when you can't track which models process personal data or produce required documentation. Auditors expect clear data lineage and comprehensive AI system documentation, but sprawled assets turn compliance into a manual, error-prone nightmare. Each undocumented model or dataset represents a regulatory violation waiting to trigger fines, legal liability, and reputational damage.
  • Operational Inefficiencies - AI sprawl creates massive operational waste through duplicate efforts—teams unknowingly build identical models because they can't see existing work. Model maintenance becomes chaotic without central tracking, critical security patches can't be applied systematically, and performance degradation goes unnoticed. When key personnel leave, their undocumented AI work becomes expensive technical debt that teams must either struggle to maintain or rebuild from scratch.

Best Practices for Managing AI Assets Sprawl

Real-time and Continuous AI Asset Discovery and Inventory

AI assets proliferate at unprecedented speeds across modern enterprises—new models deploy to production, experimental notebooks spawn in cloud environments, and third-party AI services integrate into workflows continuously throughout the organization.

Static, point-in-time discovery isn't enough. Organizations need continuous, automated scanning that identifies AI assets the moment they appear across cloud environments, development workstations, and third-party integrations. Real-time discovery prevents shadow AI from taking root and ensures your asset inventory reflects your actual AI footprint, not last quarter's snapshot.

AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM)

Traditional security tools weren't designed for AI's unique risks—they can't detect prompt injection vulnerabilities, model extraction attempts, or training data poisoning. AI Security Posture Management provides purpose-built protection that understands how AI systems can be attacked and compromised. By continuously assessing AI-specific vulnerabilities and implementing appropriate controls, organizations can protect their AI investments from emerging threats while maintaining the agility to innovate.

Implement an AI Governance Framework

Without governance, AI initiatives become a free-for-all where every team operates by different rules, creating chaos and risk. An AI governance framework establishes the guardrails that enable responsible innovation—defining which AI use cases are acceptable, what data can be used, and how models should be developed and deployed. This framework transforms AI from a wild west of experimentation into a managed capability that delivers business value while controlling risk.

Regular AI Asset Audits

AI models aren't "deploy and forget" systems—they drift, degrade, and become obsolete. Regular audits reveal which models still deliver value and which have become expensive liabilities. By systematically reviewing AI assets for performance, compliance, and business alignment, organizations can eliminate waste, reduce attack surface, and ensure their AI portfolio remains lean and effective rather than becoming a graveyard of forgotten experiments.

Standardize AI Development Lifecycle

When every team uses different tools, frameworks, and processes, AI management becomes exponentially complex. Standardization creates efficiency through consistency—security patches can be applied universally, knowledge transfers seamlessly between teams, and best practices propagate naturally. A standardized lifecycle doesn't stifle innovation; it channels creative energy into solving business problems rather than reinventing basic processes.

How Pillar can help enterprises control AI sprawl 

Pillar Security provides comprehensive AI discovery and security posture management capabilities that address AI sprawl at its core.

Our AI Discovery automatically identifies and catalogs all AI assets across your organization—from models and pipelines to libraries, meta-prompts, MCP servers and datasets. By integrating with code, data, and AI/ML platforms, Pillar continuously scans and maintains a real-time inventory of your entire AI footprint, capturing the AI-specific components that traditional code scanners and DevSecOps tools miss.

Pillar's Policy Center provides a centralized dashboard for monitoring enterprise-wide AI compliance posture

Beyond discovery, Pillar's AI-SPM conducts deep risk analysis of identified assets and maps the complex interconnections between AI components. Our engines analyze both code and runtime behavior to visualize your AI ecosystem, including emerging Agentic systems and their attack surfaces. This helps teams identify critical risks like model poisoning, data contamination, and supply chain vulnerabilities that are unique to AI pipelines.

Through continuous discovery, AI-native risk assessment, tailored red teaming, and runtime protection, Pillar Security delivers the visibility and controls needed to transform AI sprawl into secure, managed operations.

Appendix A: AI Asset Catalog

Asset Name Description Examples Risks
1. Core AI Models & Components
Foundation Models Pre-trained base models GPT-4, Claude, Llama, PaLM, Mistral Can contain supply chain backdoors, are vulnerable to poisoning attacks that affect all downstream applications, and can be jailbroken to bypass safety measures
Fine-tuned Models Customized business models Customer service models, domain-specific classifiers, company chatbots Contains proprietary business logic and IP that can be stolen or reverse-engineered
Model Files Stored model artifacts .ckpt files, .bin weights, ONNX models, SafeTensors Direct access enables model extraction and reveals architectural secrets
Model Cards Model documentation Performance metrics, intended use cases, limitations Missing or incomplete cards create compliance violations and prevent proper risk assessment; required for regulatory adherence and responsible AI governance
Model Metadata Model lineage info Version tags, training parameters, dataset references Lack of metadata violates AI governance standards, prevents audit trails, and blocks effective incident response and model rollback capabilities
Embeddings Vector representations Word2Vec, BERT embeddings, custom embeddings Can be poisoned to manipulate semantic understanding and inject biases
2. Data & Knowledge Assets
Training Datasets Model training data Customer data, scraped content, synthetic datasets Contains sensitive PII, and can be poisoned to compromise model behavior
Test Datasets Evaluation data Benchmark sets, holdout data, validation splits May contain sensitive PII; leakage exposes model vulnerabilities and enables targeted adversarial attacks
RAG/Vector Databases Knowledge stores Pinecone, Weaviate, ChromaDB, FAISS indexes Can be poisoned to inject false information and may contain unauthorized data
System Prompts AI model instructions Role definitions, behavior rules, safety guidelines Exposes proprietary business logic and operational secrets; enables attackers to bypass safety measures and manipulate AI behavior
User Prompts User inputs Chat messages, queries, commands Entry point for injection attacks and may contain sensitive user data
Model Responses AI outputs Generated text, predictions, recommendations Can disclose confidential information or produce harmful content
Policies Behavioral rules Content filters, safety guardrails, usage policies Understanding these enables targeted attacks to bypass protections
3. Runtime & Infrastructure
AI Applications User interfaces Chatbots, AI assistants, prediction apps Vulnerable to prompt injection and improper output handling causing XSS, data leaks, and injection attacks
Inference Endpoints Model APIs REST endpoints, GraphQL APIs, gRPC services Vulnerable to DDoS attacks and unauthorized model access attempts
Agent Memory/Cache Conversation state Redis caches, in-memory stores, session data Stores sensitive conversation history that violates privacy if exposed
AI Platforms ML infrastructure SageMaker, Vertex AI, Azure ML, Databricks Platform compromise affects all hosted models and data; multi-tenant risks
Agentic Platforms No-code AI builders Microsoft Copilot, CrewAI, ServiceNow, Salesforce Enables shadow AI proliferation without governance oversight
4. Development & Engineering
Notebooks Development environments Jupyter, Colab, Databricks notebooks, VS Code Stores credentials and sensitive data; vulnerable to code injection, supply chain attacks via dependencies
Coding Agents AI code generation tools GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Codeium, Amazon Q Configurations can contain malicious instructions that could hijack the agents
Frameworks ML libraries TensorFlow, PyTorch, Hugging Face, JAX Supply chain vulnerabilities and misconfigurations can compromise entire AI stack
Pipeline Jobs MLOps workflows Kubeflow, MLflow, Airflow DAGs, GitHub Actions CI/CD compromise can inject malicious code or steal credentials
MCP Servers Context protocol infra Claude MCP, custom MCP implementations Manages context access and OAuth/API credentials; compromise leads to model manipulation and credential exposure
5. Access & Integration Layer
AI Service Credentials API authentication OpenAI keys, Anthropic tokens, Cohere API keys Enables unauthorized usage, billing fraud, and quota theft
Agent OAuth Configurations Tool auth settings Function calling tokens, MCP OAuth, tool permissions Token hijacking allows unauthorized access to connected services
LLM Tools/Plugins AI extensions ChatGPT plugins, function tools, API connectors Malicious plugins can exfiltrate data or abuse AI capabilities
6. Monitoring & Governance
App Usage Logs Interaction records User queries, response times, error logs Insufficient logging creates blind spots for security monitoring
Prompt/Response Logs Conversation history Chat transcripts, API logs, interaction databases Contains sensitive data; retention policies may violate privacy regulations
Security Event Logs Incident detection Attack attempts, anomalies, security alerts Missing logs delay incident response and attack detection
Audit Trails Compliance tracking and AI risk evaluation records Access logs, change history, risk assessments Required for regulatory compliance and AI risk evaluation documentation

Subscribe and get the latest security updates

Back to blog

MAYBE YOU WILL FIND THIS INTERSTING AS WELL

Red Teaming for AI Agents

Red Teaming for AI Agents

Security for AI Agents 101

Security for AI Agents 101